Shariah CJ Mohd Na’im drops defamation suit after Lokman Adam apologised

177
- Advertisement - [resads_adspot id="2"]

Chief Syariah judge Datuk Dr Mohd Na’im Mokhtar’s suit against Datuk Lokman Noor Adam over allegations of sexual harassment was settled amicably today with an apology by the former Umno Supreme Council member.

Bernama

Lawyer Datuk Akberdin Abdul Kader, representing Mohd Na’im, said the terms of the agreement were recorded during an online proceeding before High Court Judge Datuk Rozana Ali Yusoff.

“Lokman was misinformed by a third party and he did not check with the plaintiff (Mohd Na’im) first before realising that the information provided was incorrect.

“He (Lokman) regretted and apologised for what happened and promised not to repeat the mistake again and will remove all the defamatory postings against the plaintiff (Mohd Na’im),” he said when contacted by reporters after the proceeding.

Mohd Na’im was at the proceeding, as well as lawyers Logen Eksander Abdullah and Norfazilah Jaafar, who represented Lokman.

Logen Eksander, when contacted, confirmed the matter.

Mohd Na’im, 54, filed the suit last Jan 17 in his personal capacity and sought damages amounting to RM30 million over allegations of sexual harassment against several women, including a ‘Datin’ made by Lokman against him.

Based on the statement of claims, Mohd Na’im, who is also the director-general of the Department of Syariah Judiciary Malaysia, claimed that the defendant had defamed him by making statements through two live streams on the ‘Lokman Noor Adam Official’ Facebook page on Jan 10 and Jan 13.

He also claimed that the defendant uploaded the live streams on his Youtube channel on Jan 10 and Jan 14 respectively, besides uploading three defamatory posts against him on Facebook on Jan 11 and Jan 13.

He further claimed that the defamatory statements implied that he was a spiritual opportunist, had failed to be a credible leader or set a good example for the community, and tarnished the good image of the Syariah Judiciary Department.

The plaintiff was also seeking general damages to be assessed by the court, apart from exemplary, aggravated and punitive damages amounting to RM10 million each, as well as other relief deemed fit by the court.