Cops to Charge Key Witness for Refusing to Attend Amri Inquiry

2309
- Advertisement - [resads_adspot id="2"]

Saiful Afdzan, owner of Mak Lang restaurant in Kangar, refused to turn up for the Amri inquiry despite being issued a subpoena to appear.

Police are charging a key eyewitness for failing to appear before Suhakam’s inquiry into the disappearance of Amri Che Mat.

This was told to the inquiry panel today by a representative from the deputy public prosecutor’s (DPP) office.

“The Kuala Lumpur contingent police headquarters have been told to charge the witness under Section 174 of the Penal Code,” the representative said.

The section concerns “non-attendance in obedience to an order from a public servant” and if found guilty before a court, one could be served a six-month sentence or an RM2,000 fine, or both.

The witness in question is restaurant owner Saiful Afdzan who purportedly witnessed Amri’s alleged abduction the night it happened on Nov 24, 2016.

He had refused to appear before the panel claiming the trip would result in a loss in livelihood.

Suhakam lodged a police report against Saiful on March 22 following a request by the inquiry’s chief commissioner Mah Weng Kwai.

Police observer to the inquiry and Sentul chief R Munusamy confirmed police would be following the DPP’s orders.

“The police will be charging him and we will serve a summon against him (Saiful) to appear in court,” he told the press afterwards, not offering specific dates.

Amri’s home “Syiah centre”

Earlier, lawyers for Amri’s family cross-examined Bukit Aman social extremism division principal assistant director Awaludin Jadid over why the Special Branch had been monitoring Amri prior to his disappearance.

Awaludin said that police viewed Amri’s NGO Perlis Hope, which operated from his house in Kangar, as a front for Syiah proselytisation activities and thus was gathering information about it.

“We were not focusing on Amri alone but the Syiah issue (as a whole). We do not investigate just one person.

“We viewed Amri’s house as a Syiah centre,” he told the inquiry.

In 1996, Syiah Islam was outlawed as it was considered deviant (haram) in Malaysia by the National Fatwa Council.

Awaludin explained that his division was tasked with containing potential threats to internal security which included the spread of Syiah beliefs.

“We see how the Islamic State militants in the Middle East now are in a clash between Sunni and Syiah Muslims.

“So when there are Syiah groups in Malaysia, we do not want the same to happen here,” he testified.

Awaludin retired from the police force on July 1.

“Enforced or involuntary”

Aside from Mah, today’s inquiry was presided over by commissioners Aishah Bidin and Nik Salida Suhaila Nik Saleh.

Suhakam is investigating whether the disappearances of Amri and two others were “enforced or involuntary,” as defined by the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (ICPPED), adopted by the UN General Assembly in 2006.

This is defined as the arrest, detention, abduction or any other form of deprivation of liberty by agents of the state or by persons, or groups of persons acting with the authorisation, support or acquiescence of the state.

Malaysia is not a signatory of the ICPPED.

The inquiry will resume tomorrow. – Malaysiakini