Zahid’s trial: Defence claims funds were ‘donations’, not from illegal activities

275
- Advertisement - [resads_adspot id="2"]

According to his lawyer, Zahid, on most occasions, did not know or had any nexus with the owners of the cheques.

The money-laundering charges against former deputy prime minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi cannot stand as the funds involved were “donations” and not proven to have illegal origins, his lawyer argued in court today.

Ahmad Zahid’s lead defence lawyer Hisyam Teh Poh Teik was arguing why 25 of the 27 money laundering charges against his client must fall, arguing that the key ingredient of these charges — namely the involvement of money from unlawful activities — has not been proven.

Hisyam also argued that the prosecution had failed to close the “gaps” or “loopholes” in evidence that would have been necessary to show that the funds involved were from unlawful activities.

For the 25 money laundering charges that Teh focused on today, Ahmad Zahid was accused of having given instructions to law firm Lewis & Co’s partner Muralidharan Balan Pillai on 25 separate occasions to put funds totalling RM53,878,347.95 or over RM53 million that were from unlawful activities into fixed deposit accounts.

Teh said the prosecution would have to prove these 25 money laundering charges by proving that Ahmad Zahid as the accused was directly or indirectly engaged with the transactions, and that the transactions involved proceeds of an unlawful activity as well as proving that Ahmad Zahid knew the funds involved were from unlawful activities.

However, Teh today argued that all 25 charges under Section 4(1)(a) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 was not proven to involve money from illegal activities.

Citing the evidence given by the prosecution’s witnesses and by owners of cheques that were used to put the funds into fixed deposits, Teh argued that the money that came in under the 25 charges were actually “donations” from individuals and companies for Yayasan Akalbudi — a charitable foundation where Ahmad Zahid is a trustee.

Teh also argued that Ahmad Zahid mostly did not have any connection or link to the owners of the cheques.

“The accused, in most occasions, did not know or had any nexus with the owners of the cheques,” he argued.

He said this in his submission at the end of the prosecution case over the 27 charges Zahid is facing under AMLA.

Bernama

In this trial, Ahmad Zahid, 68, ― who is a former home minister and currently the Umno president ― is facing 47 charges, namely 12 counts of criminal breach of trust concerning charitable foundation Yayasan Akalbudi’s funds, 27 counts of money laundering, and eight counts of bribery charges.

The trial, where 99 prosecution witnesses had testified previously, has now reached the end of the prosecution’s case. It is now at the stage of oral submissions which started this week, where both Ahmad Zahid’s lawyers, and the prosecution will present their final arguments verbally before the court decides if the prosecution has proven a prima facie case.

If a prima facie case is proven, the trial would then move on to the defence stage where Ahmad Zahid would be called to enter his defence and he would be able to present his evidence and witnesses in his defence. If the court finds that there is no prima facie case, Ahmad Zahid would be acquitted and released from the charges.

The offences, under Section 4(1) of the AMLA Act carries a maximum 15 years’ jail and fine of not less than five times the sum or value of the proceeds of an unlawful activity or RM5 million, whichever is the higher.

It was previously revealed that the money included a RM500,000 donation from Yayasan Al-Bukhari, RM10 million from Chia Bee Enterprise Sdn Bhd owned by philanthropist Wong Sang Woo and RM9 million from MyEG Services Bhd non-executive director Mohd Jimmy Wong Abdullah.

Wong had previously testified that he donated to the foundation as “an investment for the afterlife”.

Just before the court proceedings ended today, Ahmad Zahid’s lawyer Hamidi Mohd Noh applied to the High Court for the trial to start in the afternoon next Monday.

Hamidi explained that the Dewan Rakyat will reconvene on September 13 with the Yang di-Pertuan Agong scheduled to deliver his royal address in the morning, saying that Ahmad Zahid as an MP would have to attend the morning-only sitting in the Dewan Rakyat.

High Court judge Collin Lawrence Sequerah agreed that Ahmad Zahid has to be present at the royal address but said the trial will proceed later at 2.30pm.

The defence is scheduled to make its submissions then.


Earlier report: Sept 8, Zahid’s trial: Defence claims prosecution failed to prove CBT charges against Zahid